« UK public borrowing undershooting - was 20% VAT necessary? | Main | Will record-high US bank reserves prove inflationary? »

US stocks extended versus "six-bear average"

Posted on Monday, February 21, 2011 at 04:32PM by Registered CommenterSimon Ward | Comments3 Comments

The chart updates a comparison of the rise in the Dow Industrials index from its low in March 2009 with six prior increases following bear markets involving a fall of about 50%. (The six bears bottomed in November 1903, November 1907, December 1914, August 1921, April 1942 and December 1974. The Dow fell by 45-52% into these lows versus a 54% decline between October 2007 and March 2009.)

From its 2009 low until April 2010, the Dow mostly traded above a "six-bear average" of the prior recovery paths. This probably reflected unusually loose monetary conditions due the Federal Reserve's QE1 securities purchases, totalling $1.725 trillion.

Following the end of QE1 in March 2010, the Dow traded back to and then below the six-bear average. By early July, the index was 10% beneath the average and within 1% of the bottom of the range spanned by the prior recoveries. This suggested a buying opportunity.

The Dow built a base over the summer and took off in September as the Fed signalled QE2, following through with the announcement of a $600 billion securities purchase plan in early November. This liquidity injection, supplemented recently by a rundown of the Treasury's supplementary financing program (SFP), has pushed the index 11% above the six-bear average – a larger deviation than at the July low.

The Dow is now higher than at the equivalent stage of five of the six prior recoveries. All five of these predecessors suggest a significant fall by year-end, ranging from 10% to 31% from Friday's close of 12391 (i.e. to between 8500 and 11200).

There is, however, one exception – the rise from the low in November 1903. At the comparable stage of that increase (i.e. in November 2005), the Dow embarked on a 23% surge over 11 weeks to a level equivalent to 16000 currently.

History, therefore, suggests a five-sixths probability of a decline in the Dow but a one-sixth chance of a "moonshot" scenario, involving a final blow-off and subsequent sharp correction.

The Dow's surge over November 1905-January 1906 occurred after it had breached its previous all-time high, reached in June 1901. The move into new ground may have stimulated buying. Currently, the Dow is still 13% below its October 2007 peak but smaller stocks are close to breaking out – the Russell 2000 index is within 3% of its high. US investors are showing more interest in domestic equities, channelling $12 billion into US-focused stock mutual funds so far this year, according to the Investment Company Institute, following an outflow of $88 billion in 2010.

The "moonshot" scenario could, perhaps, be triggered by the further $450 billion rise in bank reserves implied by the Fed completing QE2 and the SFP falling to $5 billion as planned – see Friday's post.

Equity investors face a dilemma: the odds favour market weakness but there is an outside chance of a blow-off that would cause a defensively-positioned portfolio to underperform significantly. Any such surge, however, would probably end badly: the January 1906 peak marked the start of another major decline, of 49%, to a low in November 1907.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (3)

Hi Simon,

Thank you again for your excellent analysis but though I am no economist I feel we really are in uncharted waters here and that the ‘moon-shot’ scenario is more likely than 1 in 6. The reason for this presumption is that the Fed cannot stop printing money, the US debt is too huge and no foreign Investor will be able to soak up the massive requirement for monthly US debt issuance. The Fed must continue to step in and so QE3, QE4 is very likely…this, I believe, will in turn massively distort the stock market valuation for the next Year. It will lead to the StockMarket being higher than it should be and will potentially depreciate currency which in turn will raise StockMarkets in nominal terms.

I would appreciate your views on this topic.

Regards

February 22, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterMark Davies

Mark,
I am not sure that the Fed will be forced into QE3, QE4 etc. The UK has managed to fund a similarly-sized deficit without QE2. Bond yields would rise by more in a QE3 scenario because of the inflationary implications. Equities would probably also suffer beyond the very near term.

February 22, 2011 | Registered CommenterSimon Ward

Firstly, thank you very much for taking the time out to reply to my remark.
Time will tell but in my humble opinion I think QE3 will happen....
Why, and in answer to your response ....
1. We are in a calm before a serious debt crisis storm and so both the US and the UK currently have some time, in the short term; this is why the US is 'managing' its current funding
2. The UK is rightly getting its fiscal house in order at a reasonable pace, however there is no credible Debt reduction Plan in the US, in fact its the opposite.
3. There is a slow but steady loss of confidence in the dollar...please see various noted bureacrats who have raised a global or hard-backed currency. Therefore who is really going to invest in a depreciating currency bond market ? QE3 is the logical answer.
4. Even now Foreigners are spending less money in the US Bond Market
I agree with your remark about Equities being affected in the medium term with QE3 but as stated in the near term this may 'goose' Stocks a final time until the Market loses faith in the Dollar and US economy.
Thanks again.

February 22, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterMark Davies

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>